Case Law › High Court › Ita/628/2018 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/628/2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax Ltu v. M/S. Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd

High Court 31 Oct 2019 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · karnataka_bng_old

Parties

Date of order

31 Oct 2019

Assessment year(s)

2013-2014

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/628/2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax Ltu v. M/S. Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 3l[ST|]DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE. THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.628 OF 7018 BEI|WEEN 1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX |LTU, 7 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING|SO FEET ROAD, KORMANGALABENGALURU-560 095.LTU, 7 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING|SO FEET ROAD, KORMANGALABENGALURU-560 095. 2DTHE INCOME TAX OFFICER (OSD)( TDS) LIU, 7 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING.80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALABENGALURU-560 095.LIU, 7 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING.80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALABENGALURU-560 095. _. APPELLANTS. (BY SRI: DILIP, ADVOCATE FOR-SRI: K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)SRI: K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) AND" M/S. KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION |CORPORATION LIMITEDCHIEF ENGINEER (ELE)TRANSMISSION ZONE.PRASARANA BHAVAN FITS COMPOUNDN.R. MOHALLA|MYSURU-5/0 0O0/. . RESPONDENT (BY SRI: SHARATH, ADVOCATE FORSRI: CHYTHANYA K.K., ADVOCATE)| THIS|INCOMETAXAPPEAL|ISFILEDUNDER|SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT|OF|ORDER.DATEDO2.05.2018|PASSED|IN|LIANO.2286/BANG/2017, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-2014, PRAYING THIS HON BLE COURT TO FORMULATE THESUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE;|ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED|BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURUIN ITA NO.2286/BANG/2017 DATED 02.05.2018, FOR)ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-2014 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER.OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER CONFIRMING THE.ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (OSD)|(TDS), LTU, BENGALURU AND TO PASS SUCH OTHER.SUITABLE ORDERS AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT.TO GRANT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE.CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. OK OOK THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL|HEARING THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THEFOLLOWING: JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the appellants submit that the appeal is not maintainable in view of the monetary. limits in terms of Circular No.1/7 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019passed by Director (1TJ), Central Board Direct Taxes, New. DelNl. 2.In view of the submission made, the appeal is_ qaismissed as sucn. Sd/- JUDGE *pgn/-| Sd/-| JUDGE |

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.