Ita/629/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. V.s. Lad & Sons
High Court
24 Oct 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/629/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. V.s. Lad & Sons
Date of order
24 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
2004-2005
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/629/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. V.s. Lad & Sons, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU|ON THE 27 DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 |
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGIL
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.629 OF 2013
BETWEEN:
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL CIRCLE.BENGALURU-560 OO1.
— APPELLANT.
(BY SRI E.I. SANMATHI, ADVOCATE)|
AND
M/S. V.S. LAD AND SONS|PRASHANT NIVASKRISHNA NAGARSANDUR-583 119.BELLARY DISTRICT|KARNATAKA.
RESPONDENT|
(BY SRI M. LAVA, ADVOCATE)
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION|260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER)DATED 12.07.2013 PASSED IN ITA NO.561/BANG/2012, FOR|THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2004-2005, PRAYING THIS HON BLE COURT TO DECIDE THE FOREGOING QUESTION OF LAW AND|/ OR SUCH OTHER QUESTIONS OF LAW AS MAY BE)FORMULATED BY THE HON'’BLE COURT AS DEEMED FIT AND
SET ASIDE THE APPELLATE ORDER DATED 12.0/.72013PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, “C|BENCH, BENGALURU IN APPEAL PROCEEDINGS NO. ITA|NO.561/BANG/2012 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2004-2005|AS SOUGHT FOR IN THIS APPEAL.
OK AK
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL|HEARING THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THE!FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Tne learned counsel for the appellant submit that.the appeal is not maintainable in view of the monetary|limits in terms of Circular No.1/7 of 2019 £42da08.08.2019, passed by Director (ITJ), Central Board)Direct Taxes, New Delhi.
2.|In view of the submission made, the appeal is.dismissed as such. |
Sd/-
JUDGE
JJ
Sd/-
JUDGE |
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.