Ita/63/2017 Of Dakshina Kannada Koota v. The Assistant Director Of Income Tax
High Court
23 Dec 2020 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/63/2017 Of Dakshina Kannada Koota v. The Assistant Director Of Income Tax
Date of order
23 Dec 2020
Assessment year(s)
2009-10
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/63/2017 Of Dakshina Kannada Koota v. The Assistant Director Of Income Tax, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23[RD|]DAY OF DECEMBER 27027
PRESENT|
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND|
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD
BETWEEN:
LT.A. NO.63 OF 2017
DAKSHINA KANNADA KOOTA>BRAHMANARA MITRA MANDALI.REP. BY ITS TREASURERSRI. A.V. SHASHIDARA#12, BULL TEMPLE ROAD|BASAVANAGUDI, BANGALORE-560004—PAN: AAATD Q6/0K.
(BY SRI. BHAIRAV KUTTAPPA, ADV., FOR|SRI. M. LAVA, ADV.,)
.... APPELLAN/
AND"
THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME-T AX(EXEMPTION), CIRCLE-17(1)UNITY BUILLDING ANNEXURE6TH FLOOR, MISSION ROAD, BANGALORE-56002/7.
.., RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. T.N.C. SRIDHAR, ADV., FOR-SRI. JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, ADV.,)
THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SEC. J6O0-A OF INCOME TAXACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 26.08.2016 PASSEDIN ITA NO.1483 & 1484/BANG/2013 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR-2009-10 & 2010-11, PRAYING TO:
(i) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW,STATED ABOVE AND ANSWER THE SAME IN FAVOUR OF THE.APPELLAN!. |
(ii) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE FINDINGS TO.THE EXTENT AGAINST THE APPELLANT IN THE COMMON ORDER.PASSED BY THE ITAT, 'SMC-A. BENCH, BENGALURU IN ITANOS.1483 & 1484/BANG/2013 DATED 26-08-2016 FOR THEASSESSMENT YEARS 2009-10 AND 2010-11 RESPECTIVELY|(ANNEXURE-A) & ETC.
THIS I.T.A. COMING ON FOR’ HEARING, THIS’ DAY,ALOK ARADHE J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: |
JUDGMENT
Mr.Bhairav Kuttappa, learned counsel for Mr.M.Lava,jearned counsel! for the assessee.
Mr.T.N.C.Sridnar, jiearneccounselforMr.JeevanJ.Neeralgi, learned counsel for the respondent.
Learned counsel for the assessee has filed a memo'seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal. Theaforesaid memo is taken on record.
2. For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal isdismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the assessee to revivethe same if occasion so arises.
Sd/-JUDGE
Sd/-—JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.