Ita/633/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S The Shamrao Vithal
High Court
04 Jul 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Ita/633/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S The Shamrao Vithal
Date of order
04 Jul 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/633/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S The Shamrao Vithal, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKADHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 4 DAY OF JULY 2016
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH
AND
THE HON’‘BLE MRS. JUSTICE RATHNAKALI.T.A. NO.633/2015
BETWEEN
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,
TDS, GROUND FLOOR,
PUNDALIK NIWAS, RUA-DE-OUREM,
PANAJAI-GOA-403001L.|
2. THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER,
TDS WARD, C.R BUILDING,
ANNEXE, P.B.ROAD,
NAVANAGAR, HUBBALLI-580025.
APPELLANTS
(BY SRI Y.V.RAVIRAJ, ADV. FOR SRI ARAVIND K.V., ADVOCATE)
AND:
M/S. THE SHAMRAO VITHALCO-OPERATIVE BANK LITD.,GROUND FLOOR,SATELLITE SPACE AGE COMPLEX,KOPPIKAR ROAD, HUBLI.PAN: AAAAT QO1//C
RESPONDENT
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAXACT, 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 30.06.2015 PASSEDIN|ITANO.677/BANG/2015,FOR.THE|ASESSMENT|YEAR2013-2014.PRAYING TO)FORMULATETHE|SUBSTANTIALQUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE AND ALLOW THE APPEAL
AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ITAT, BANGALOREIN ITA NO.677/BANG/2015 DATED 30.06.2015 AND CONFIRMTHE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER CONFIRMINGTHE ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD,HUBBALLL.
THISTTACOMINGONFOR.ORDERSTHISDAY,H.G. RAMESH J.TDELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral)"
This appeal is listed for orders re.non-compliance ofoffice objections raised on the appeal. However, learnedcounsel appearing for the appellants fairly submits that thequestion of law raised in this appeal is answered against theappellants in ITA Nos.100047/2015 and 100048-49/2015(D.D. 16.12.2015), and hence, this appeal is liable to bedismissed. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
Sd/-JUDGE
Sd/-JUDGE
KMS
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.