Ita/634/2007 Of M/S P Srinivasa Setty And Sons v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
06 Nov 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/634/2007 Of M/S P Srinivasa Setty And Sons v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
06 Nov 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Ita/634/2007 Of M/S P Srinivasa Setty And Sons v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2012) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Since the order on the basis ofwhich the penalty was set aside, the order of levy ofpenalty also requires to be set aside.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 06 DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2012
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SREEDHAR RAO|
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.V.PINTO
INCOME-TAX APPEAL NO.634/2007|
BRTWREB
M/S P SRINIVASA SETTY AND SONSREP. BY HIS KARTHA SRI P.S.VISHWANATHGANDHDHINAGAR.TUMKUR.
_. APPKELLANT
(BY SRILA SHANKAR & M LAVA, ADVS.)
ANT
THR INCOME TAX OFFICKR
WARD-1, RAMAKRISHNA BUILDING
KUNIGAL ROADTUMKUR
—. RBSPONDBENT
(BY SRI. K V ARAVIND, ADV.)
THIS ITA IS FILED U/S.260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961)ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 20-04-2007 PASSED IN|ITA 1588/BANG/2005 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEARS1989-90, PRAYING THAT FOR THE REASONS STATEDTHRRBIN THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY BRK PLEASKD TO:
I. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW|STATED THEREIN,
Il ALLOW THR APPEAL AND SEHT ASIDE THE ORDER
PASSED BY ITAT IN ITA 1988/BANG/2005 DATED 20-04-2007 (ANNEXURE 'A’), IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE ANDEQUITY.
THIS [TA IS COMING ON FOR FINAL HBARING THIS)DAY,SREEDHAR RAO J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-
JU DBGMENT
This Court in ITA No.2341/2005 has set aside theorder of assessment and remanded the matter to the'Assessing Officer for fresh assessment. The AssessingOfficer on the basis of the extinct order of assessment,has levied penalty. Since the order on the basis ofwhich the penalty was set aside, the order of levy ofpenalty also requires to be set aside. Accordingly, theappeal is allowed.
Sd/-|JUDGE
Sd/-|JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.