Ita/635/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Mysore Merchant Co-Operative Bank Ltd
High Court
29 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/635/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Mysore Merchant Co-Operative Bank Ltd
Date of order
29 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/635/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Mysore Merchant Co-Operative Bank Ltd, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BBNGALURU
DATBD THIS THER 2 DAY OF JANUARY, 20106
PRESENT
THR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K. PATIL
AND
THR HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA|
ITA No. 6389/201
BETWREN
1.The Commissioner of
Income-tax, TDS
00/1, Shilpashree
Vidhyaranya ComplexVishveshwaranagarMysore-570 OOS.VishveshwaranagarMysore-570 OOS.
2.The Income-tax Officer,TDS WardTDS Ward
99/1, Shilpashree
Vidhyaranya Complex
Vishveshwaranagar
Mysore-9570 OO8.
... Appellant
(By Sri. K.V.Aravind, Advocate)
AND
M/s. Mysore Merchant Co-OperativeBank Ltd.,Jaganmohan Palace RoadMysore.PAN:BLRTO 3SODOF.
...Responden
This Appeal is filed under Section 260-A of Income-tax|Act 1961, to set aside the order passed by the ITAT,|Bangalore in ITA No.8/7/Bang/2015 dated 29.06.2015confirming the order of the Appellate Commissioner and|confirming the order passed by the Income Tax Officer, TDSWard,Mysore.
This Appeal coming on for Admission, this. day, |N. K. Patil, J..delivered the following: |
JUDGMENT
This appeal by the Revenue directed against the)impugnedOrder.dated29 Ob6.2015passed1n ITA|No.8/7/Bang/2015 on the file of the Income Tax AppellateTribunal, Bangalore, confirming the order of the Appellate|Commissioner confirming the order of the Income Tax|Officer, TDS Ward, Mysore, to consider the following|substantial questions of law.
“1.Whether the Tribunal was correct in relyingon a circular No.9/2002 when the same wasquashed by the Hon’ble Mumbai High Court andwill a circular become a legal document merely forthe reason that it was not withdrawn by theissuing authority ?.
anWhether the Tribunalwas correct inconcluding that the cooperative banks were neverrequired to deduct tax on the interest paid to itsmembers on the ground that they were exemptunder Section 194A(3)(v) of the Income Tax Act,1961] ?
3.Whetherthe Tribunal1ScorrectIn overlookingtheestablishedprincipleof“Generalia specialibus non derogant” vis a vis the
special provisions of Section 194A(3)(vita)(b) andgeneral provisions of Section 194A(3)(v) of theIncome-tax Act, 1961?.
4 |Whether the provisions of section 194A(3)(v)|of the Act are applicable to nominal member orsympathizer member also or the provisions willapply only to such members who hold shares andhave right to vote in general body meeting andentitled to share of profit is of the co-operativesociety, keeping in view of circular No.9 of 2002issued by the CBDT?.
5.|Whether in respect of interest paid on timedeposit is by a Co-operative society engaged inthe business of banking, the clause(v) whichdeals with Co-operative Societies will apply orclause (via) which mentions specifically ‘a co-operative society engaged in the business ofbanking finds application and is 194A(3)(v)applicable P.
2.We have heard the learned Counsel for the
Appellants.
3.Learned Counsel for the appellants submitted|that the instant appeal may be dismissed as withdrawnreserving liberty to the appellants to file an appeal on the
same cause of action after incorporating necessary questionsof law for consideration.
4Submission ot the learned Counsel for the|appellants is placed on record.
5.The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn reserving|liberty to the appellants to file an appeal on the same cause|of action incorporating additional substantial questions of law, within two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of thisJudgment. Ordered accordingly.
AN/-
Sd/-|JUDGE
Sd/-JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.