Ita/636/2015 Of Mrs. Suvina Krupal v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
27 Jan 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/636/2015 Of Mrs. Suvina Krupal v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
27 Jan 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/636/2015 Of Mrs. Suvina Krupal v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2/[TH|]DAY OF JANUARY 2071|
PRESENT|
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND|
THE HON’‘’BLE MR. JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASW A
BETWEEN:
ILT.A. NO.636 OF 2015
MRS, SUVINA KRUPALNO.78, SY.NO.175/6|NEAR ANJANEYA TEMPLE IB ROADSOMAWARPET-5/12360KODAGU DISTRICT.... APPELLAN[
(BY MR. S. ANNAMALAI, ADV., FOR MR. M. LAVA, ADV.,)
AND*
THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER.WARD-1, SRIVALLI BUILDING|CHIKPET, MADIKERI-571201.
(BY MR. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.,)
~. RESPONDENT
THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SEC. J6O0-A OF INCOME TAXACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 29.06.2015 PASSEDIN ITA NO.336 & 337/BANG/2014 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEARS.2003-04 & 2004-05, PRAYING TO:
(i) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW,STATED ABOVE AND ANSWER THE SAME IN FAVOUR OF THE.APPELLAN!. |
(ii) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE FINDINGS TO.THE EXTENT AGAINST THE APPELLANT IN THE ORDER PASSED BY.THE TRIBUNAL IN ITA NO.336 & 337/BANG/2014 DATED29.06.2015.|
THIS I.7T.A. COMING ON FOR’ HEARING, THIS’ DAY, |ALOK ARADHE J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: |
JUDGMENT
Mr.S.Annamalai, learned counsel for the assessee.
Mr.K.V.Aravind, learned counsel for the revenue.
Learned counsel for the assessee submits that the|assessee has approached under the Vivad se Visnwasscheme and Form 3 under the scneme nas been issued. He,tnerefore, seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the appealand has filed a memo in this regard. The aforesaid memois |taken on record.
2. In view of the aforesaid submission, the appeal is_dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the assessee to revivethe same if occasion so arises.
Sd/-—JUDGE
Sd/-—JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.