Case LawHigh Court › Ita/636/2015 Of Mrs. Suvina Krupal v. Th...

Ita/636/2015 Of Mrs. Suvina Krupal v. The Income Tax Officer

High Court 27 Jan 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/636/2015 Of Mrs. Suvina Krupal v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
27 Jan 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/636/2015 Of Mrs. Suvina Krupal v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2/[TH|]DAY OF JANUARY 2071| PRESENT| THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND| THE HON’‘’BLE MR. JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASW A BETWEEN: ILT.A. NO.636 OF 2015 MRS, SUVINA KRUPALNO.78, SY.NO.175/6|NEAR ANJANEYA TEMPLE IB ROADSOMAWARPET-5/12360KODAGU DISTRICT.... APPELLAN[ (BY MR. S. ANNAMALAI, ADV., FOR MR. M. LAVA, ADV.,) AND* THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER.WARD-1, SRIVALLI BUILDING|CHIKPET, MADIKERI-571201. (BY MR. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.,) ~. RESPONDENT THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SEC. J6O0-A OF INCOME TAXACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 29.06.2015 PASSEDIN ITA NO.336 & 337/BANG/2014 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEARS.2003-04 & 2004-05, PRAYING TO: (i) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW,STATED ABOVE AND ANSWER THE SAME IN FAVOUR OF THE.APPELLAN!. | (ii) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE FINDINGS TO.THE EXTENT AGAINST THE APPELLANT IN THE ORDER PASSED BY.THE TRIBUNAL IN ITA NO.336 & 337/BANG/2014 DATED29.06.2015.| THIS I.7T.A. COMING ON FOR’ HEARING, THIS’ DAY, |ALOK ARADHE J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: | JUDGMENT Mr.S.Annamalai, learned counsel for the assessee. Mr.K.V.Aravind, learned counsel for the revenue. Learned counsel for the assessee submits that the|assessee has approached under the Vivad se Visnwasscheme and Form 3 under the scneme nas been issued. He,tnerefore, seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the appealand has filed a memo in this regard. The aforesaid memois |taken on record. 2. In view of the aforesaid submission, the appeal is_dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the assessee to revivethe same if occasion so arises. Sd/-—JUDGE Sd/-—JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan