Case Law › High Court › Ita/638/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income T...

Ita/638/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. M/S. Jyothi Wines, Cochin

High Court 25 Jul 2016 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · highcourtofkerala

Parties

Date of order

25 Jul 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/638/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. M/S. Jyothi Wines, Cochin, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC &THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU MONDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF JULY 2016/3RD SRAVANA, 1938 ITA.No. 638 of 2009 ( ) ------------------------ AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA (S&S)2/COCH/2004 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH DATED 19-10-2004 APPELLANT(S)RESPONDENT: ------------ THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,COCHIN. BY ADVS.SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT(S)/APPELLANT:: ------------------------- M/S.JYOTHI WINES, THAMMANAM ROAD, VYTTILA, COCHIN. THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25-07-2016,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ANTONY DOMINIC & DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, JJ. ----------------------------------- I.T.A.No.638 of 2009 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 25[th] day of July, 2016 JUDGMENT Antony Dominic, J. It is submitted by the standing counsel for theRevenue that they are not desirous of pursuing thismatter. In view of the submission so made, theappeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, Judge. Sd/- DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, Judge. kkb. /True copy/ PS to Judge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.