Case Law › High Court › Ita/642/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/642/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Cochin v. M/S.pulimoottil Silk House,Thodupuzha

High Court 27 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · highcourtofkerala

Parties

Date of order

27 Jul 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/642/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Cochin v. M/S.pulimoottil Silk House,Thodupuzha, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Since the Tribunal declined to entertain the appeal for the reasonthat the tax effect is less than the monetary limit for filing appeal, wedo not think there is any scope for entertaining appeal on this issue.Consequently appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM MONDAY, THE 27TH JULY 2009 / 5TH SRAVANA 1931 ITA.No. 642 of 2009() --------------------- ITA.990/COCH/2005 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT ----------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX COCHIN. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT(S): --------------- PULIMOOTTIL SILK HOUSE, THODUPUZHA. THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ. ....................................................................I.T. Appeal No.642 of 2009 ....................................................................Dated this the 27th day of July, 2009. JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. Since the Tribunal declined to entertain the appeal for the reasonthat the tax effect is less than the monetary limit for filing appeal, wedo not think there is any scope for entertaining appeal on this issue.Consequently appeal is dismissed. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJudge pms C.K.ABDUL REHIM Judge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.