Ita/643/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)- 2 v. M/S Kp Pouches Pvt. Ltd
High Court
28 May 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Ita/643/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)- 2 v. M/S Kp Pouches Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
28 May 2018
Assessment year(s)
2007-08
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/643/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)- 2 v. M/S Kp Pouches Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed along with the pending application.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~8
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 643/2018 & CM APPL. 22622/2018 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)- 2
..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel for the Revenue.
versus
M/S KP POUCHES PVT. LTD
Through:
..... Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA O R D E R
%
28.05.2018
The Revenue questions orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which had upheld the relief granted to the assessee for Assessment Year 2007-08. The amounts were added by the Assessing Officer on the basis of inferences drawn in the course of search and seizure proceedings, pursuant to notice under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter ‘the Act’).
The CIT(A), whom the assessee approached, partially granted relief. Both parties approached the ITAT which accepted the assessee’s cross-objection and upheld the CIT(A)’s order with respect –to cancellation of the amounts brought to tax. The ITAT ruled –correctly in the opinion of the Court that in the absence of incriminating materials seized in the search proceedings under Section 132 of the Act, the amounts could not have been brought to
tax as they were in the present case; the ITAT applied the ruling in CIT vs. Kabul Chawla, (2016) 380 ITR 573.
No substantial question of law arises. The appeal is dismissed along with the pending application.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
MAY 28, 2018 nn
A. K. CHAWLA, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.