Ita/65/2021 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. Shri S Dasarathraj Dhariwall
High Court
25 Mar 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/65/2021 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. Shri S Dasarathraj Dhariwall
Date of order
25 Mar 2021
Assessment year(s)
2008-09
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/65/2021 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. Shri S Dasarathraj Dhariwall, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25 DAY OF MARCH, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY
I.T.A.No.65/2021
BETWEEN:
1. The Principal Commissioner
of Income Tax-7,
BMTC Complex,
Koramangala, Bangalore. Bangalore.
2. The Income Tax Officer,
New Ward 7(2)(1), Old Ward 9(1), Bengaluru. Old Ward 9(1), Bengaluru.
… APPELLANTS
(By Sri Sanmathi.E.I., Adv.)
AND:
Shri S.Dasarathraj Dhariwall, S/o late P.Surajmull Dhariwal, No.98/1, Main Road, Nazarbad, Mysore – 570 010. PAN:
… RESPONDENT
This ITA is filed under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961, praying to set aside the Order dated 02.01.2019
passed in ITA No.1978/Bang/2018, for the assessment year 2008-09, by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SMC A Bench, Bengaluru.
This appeal coming on for Orders, this day, Satish Chandra Sharma J., delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
The tax effect in the present appeal is Rs.6,44,760/-, and therefore, in the light of the Circular bearing No.23/2019 dated 06.09.2019, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) as the monetary limit is less than Rs.One Crore, the present appeal is dismissed as not maintainable, with liberty to file a fresh appeal in case the CBDT granting permission as required under the Circular (supra).
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.