Ita/659/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. Shri.jacob J.thaliath, Cochin
High Court
28 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/659/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. Shri.jacob J.thaliath, Cochin
Date of order
28 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/659/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. Shri.jacob J.thaliath, Cochin, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Consequently appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM
TUESDAY, THE 28TH JULY 2009 / 6TH SRAVANA 1931
ITA.No. 659 of 2009()
---------------------
ITA.1133/COCH/2005 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT
-----------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
COCHIN.
BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES)
SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S):
---------------
SRI.JACOB J.THALLIATH, PROP.OCEAN BOUNTY
26/1994, NEAR ST.JOSEPH CHURCH, K.P.VALLON ROAD,
KOCHI-682 020.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 28/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
C .N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &C. K. ABDUL REHIM, JJ.
--------------------------------------------
I.T.A. No. 659 OF 2009
--------------------------------------------
Dated this the 28th day of July, 2009
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair,J.
Since the Tribunal has refused to entertain the appeal for thereason that the amount of tax involved is below the limit under thenorms for filing appeal to it, we do not find any ground to interferewith the order of the Tribunal. Consequently appeal is dismissed.
(C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)Judge.
(C. K. ABDUL REHIM)
Judge.
kk
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.