Case LawHigh Court › Ita/660/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/660/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri K L Srihari (Huf)

High Court 28 Aug 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/660/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri K L Srihari (Huf)
Date of order
28 Aug 2012
Assessment year(s)
2000-01
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/660/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri K L Srihari (Huf), the High Court (2012) decided the matter.

Decision: In view of the decision of this courtin I.T.A.No.121/2007 this appeal is also to be disposed of onsimilar terms.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 28 DAY OF AUGUST, 2012| PRESENT THR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.SREBDHAR RAO ANT) THR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICK B.MANOHAR 1.T.A. No. 660 OF 2007 BE TW BE 1.The Commissioner of Income Tax,C.R. Building,Queens Road,Bangalore.C.R. Building,Queens Road,Bangalore. 2.The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,Central Circle-1(1),C.R. Building,Queens Road,Bangalore.Central Circle-1(1),C.R. Building,Queens Road,Bangalore. Appellants (By Sri K.V. Aravind, Advocate) AND: ohri K.L. Srihari (HUF),No.9, Seshadri Road,Bangalore-Y. Respondent (By Sri 8S. Sundaresh and Sri 8S. Sukumar, Advocates This I.T.A. is filed U/s.2600-A of the IT. Act, 1961|arising out of Order dated 06.12.2006 passed in ITANo.495/BNG/2005, for the Assessment Year 2000-01, praying that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to: |(i) formulate the substantial questions of law stated thereinand (11) allow the appeal and set aside the order passed bythe ITAT, Bangalore in ITA No.495/BNG/2005, dated|06.12.2006contirmtheordersOT|theAppellateCommissioner and confirm the order passed by the DeputyCommissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1(1), Bangalorein the interest of justice and equity. This appeal is coming on for final hearing this day,|SREEDHAR RAO, J.,delivered the following: JU DBGMENT In this appeal, the assessee offered income as business|income and claimed certain deductions. The AssessingOfficer considered the income as “from other sources” anddisallowed the deduction. In view of the decision of this courtin I.T.A.No.121/2007 this appeal is also to be disposed of onsimilar terms. L.T.A.No.18/2005 disposed of on 09.03.2010 has held theissued in favour of the revenue. Accordingly, the appeal isdisposed of. | 3.With regard to the question of monetary limit toprefer an appeal, the appellant is at liberty to make anapplication for revival of appeal subject to the result of thedecision of the Supreme Court in $.L.P.No.27468/2012. psg* od/-|JUDGE od/-|JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan