Case LawHigh Court › Ita/660/2023 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/660/2023 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Apple India Private Ltd

High Court 16 Jan 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/660/2023 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Apple India Private Ltd
Date of order
16 Jan 2025
Assessment year(s)
2016-2017
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/660/2023 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Apple India Private Ltd, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In view of the above, Appeal is dismissed, costs having made easy.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Digitally signedby NANDINI DLocation: HighCourt ofKarnataka NC: 2025:KHC:1610-DBITA No. 660 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16 DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.660 OF 2023 BETWEEN: 1. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BMTC COMPLEX, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE. BMTC COMPLEX, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE. 2. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX SPECIAL RANGE, AS AO I, BANGALORE SPECIAL RANGE, AS AO I, BANGALORE …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. SANMATHI E I.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M/S APPLE INDIA PRIVATE LTD., 19 FLOOR, CONCORDE TOWER C, 19 FLOOR, CONCORDE TOWER C, UB CITY NO.24, VITTAL MALLYA ROAD, BANGALORE - 560001 PAN. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. T. SURYANARAYANA, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SMT. TANMAYEE RAJKUMAR, ADVOCATE) THIS ITA / INCOME TAX APPEAL UNDER SEC.260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 31/05/2023 PASSED IN ITA NO 626/BANG/2020, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2016-2017. PRAYING THAT THIS HON’BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO (1) DECIDE THE FOREGOING QUESTION OF LAW AND / OR SUCH OTHER QUESTIONS OF - 2 - LAW AS MAY BE FORMULATED BY THE HON’BLE COURT AS DEEMED FIT.(2) SET ASIDE THE APPELLATE ORDER DATED 31/05/2023 PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, B BENCH, BENGALURU, AS SOUGHT FOR, IN THE RESPONDENT-ASSESSEES CASE, IN APPEAL PROCEEDINGS NO. ITA NO. 626/BANG/2020 (ANNEXURE-A) FOR A.Y.2016-2017 AND ETC., THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT) The subject matter of this Appeal is substantially similar to the one in APPLE INDIA (P) LTD. v DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, [2023] 152 taxmann.com 102 (Karnataka), disposed off by a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 24.03.2023. In the said case, incidentally the very same assessee happened to be the appellant. 2. We are also told at the Bar that the challenge to the Coordinate Bench decision has been negatived by the Apex Court in SLP (Civil) Diary No.5282/2024 disposed off on 07.03.2024. 3. In view of the above, Appeal is dismissed, costs having made easy. Sd/- (KRISHNA S DIXIT) JUDGE Sd/- (G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE DR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan