Case LawHigh Court › Ita/661/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/661/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S The Reddi Sahakara Bank Niyamitha

High Court 05 Oct 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Ita/661/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S The Reddi Sahakara Bank Niyamitha
Date of order
05 Oct 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/661/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S The Reddi Sahakara Bank Niyamitha, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THER HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKDHARWAD BENCH ON THER DAY OF OCTOBER, 2016 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.s.DINESH KUMAR LT.A. NO. 661/2015)& LT.A. NO. 1194/2016 BETWEEN: 1.THER COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TATDs, GROUND FLOOR,PUNDALIK NIWAS,TDs, GROUND FLOOR,PUNDALIK NIWAS, RUA — DEFENDANT — OUREM, PANAJI — GOA — 403001, 2.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS)TDS WARD, C R BUILDINGTDS WARD, C R BUILDING ANNEXE, P.B. ROAD,NAVANAGAR, HUBLI 580025.NAVANAGAR, HUBLI 580025. (BY SRI Y.V.RAVIRAJ, ADVOCATE) .. APPELLANTS AND: M/S. THE RADDI SAHAKARA BANK NIYAMITHAHEAD OFFICE BANK ROAD,DHARWAD — 580 001,PAN : AAAAT 3297K. .. RESPONDENT (BY SRI S. PARTHASARATHI & H.R. KAMBIYAVAR, ADVS.) THERESE INCOME TAX APPEALS ARE FILED UNDER SECTI260A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THEORDERS DATED | 10.07.2015, PASSED BY THE INCOME TAPPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE, IN LT.A. NO.368/BANG/2015& SP NO.51/BANG/2015, CONFIRMING THE ORDER OF THEAPPELLATE COMMISSIONER AND CONFIRM THER ORDER PASSEBY THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), HUBLI, THESE APPEALS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,RAVI MALIMATH J,.DEBLELIVERED THE KFOLILOW JUDGMENT Revenue, with a question of law as to whetherTribunal was correct in holding that a Co-operative Bankwas not required to deduct tax on the interest paid to themembers on the ground that they were exempt underSection 194A(3)(v) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (forbrevity, ‘the Act’) has presented these appeals. A DivisionBench of this Court in I.T.A. No.100180/2015 vide itsjudgement dated 17.08.2016 by placing reliance on thcircular bearing No.19/2015 in F. No.142/14/2015 TPLissued by the Ministry of Finance, Government of India,has held that the Co-operative Bank was not required todeduct tax from the payment of interest on Time Deposits of its members paid or credited on or before 01.06.2015. The relevant portion of the circular reads as follows : “42.5 In view of this, the provisionsof the section 194(3)(v) of the Income-taxAct have been amended so as to expresslyprovide that the exemption provided fromdeduction of tax from payment of interestto members by a co-operative societyunder Section 194A(3)(v) of the Income-tax Act shall not apply to the payment ofinterest on time deposits by the co-operative banks to its members. As thisAmendment1S|effective|from34-prospective date of 1[73]June, 2015, the co-operative bank shall be required to deducttax from the payment of interest on timedeposits of its members, on or after the 1[73]June 2015. Hence, a cooperative bank wasnot required to deduct tax from thepayment of interest on time deposits of itsmembers paid or credited before 1[73]june2015.” 2. The grievance of the revenue is with regard to afinding recorded by the Tribunal that the Co-operativeBanks were never required to deduct tax on the interestpaid. The said issue is no moreres integraand settled inthe aforementioned judgment dated 17.8.2016 in ITANo.100180/2015. Therefore, these appeals fail and areaccordinelydismissedNo costs, Sd/-JUDGE Sd/-JUDGE 4/D
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan