Case LawHigh Court › Ita/66/2000 Of The Commissioner Of Incom...

Ita/66/2000 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Metro Trading Syndicate,Cochin

High Court 07 Nov 2006 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/66/2000 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Metro Trading Syndicate,Cochin
Date of order
07 Nov 2006
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Ita/66/2000 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Metro Trading Syndicate,Cochin, the High Court (2006) decided the matter.

Decision: The Income Tax Appeal is disposed of as above.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH TUESDAY, THE 7TH NOVEMBER 2006 / 16TH KARTHIKA 1928 ITA.No. 66 of 2000() --------------------------- ITA.17COCH/1996 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT ----------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,COCHIN. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON(SR.),SC FOR IT RESPONDENT: --------------------- M/S.METRO TRADING SYNDICATE, COCHIN. BY ADV. SRI.P.BALAKRISHNAN (E) THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07/11/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & K.M.JOSEPH, JJ. ..................................................................... .....................................................................Dated this the 7th day of November, 2006. Ramachandran Nair, J. JUDGMENT The appeal appears to have been filed on the misapprehension that theobservations of the Tribunal while remanding the matter will restrict the officer'sauthority to decide the issue in accordance with law. We find from the order of theTribunal that the respondent-assessee's claim for deduction under Section 80HHC(3)(b) is remanded by the Tribunal for fresh consideration. Standing Counselsubmitted that subsequent to the order of the Tribunal, there has been judgmentsof this court touching upon the issue. We make it clear that the Assessing Officeris free to decide the matter afresh based on remand by the Tribunal without beinginfluenced by any observations of the Tribunal and he is free to decide the issue inaccordance with law and based on binding decisions of this court or the SupremeCourt. The Income Tax Appeal is disposed of as above. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Judge K.M.JOSEPHJudge C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &K.M.JOSEH, JJ.----------------------------------------- T.R.C. No. of 200-------------------------------JUDGMENT Dated
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan