Ita/66/2012 Commissioner Of Income Tax – Xvi, Kolkata v. M/S. Karry Overseas
High Court
28 Nov 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Ita/66/2012 Commissioner Of Income Tax – Xvi, Kolkata v. M/S. Karry Overseas
Date of order
28 Nov 2023
Assessment year(s)
2003-04
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Ita/66/2012 Commissioner Of Income Tax – Xvi, Kolkata v. M/S. Karry Overseas, the High Court (2023) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is dismissed being below the monetary limit fixed under the aforesaid Circular.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
OD – 21
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction [Income Tax]
ORIGINAL SIDE
ITA/66/2012 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – XVI, KOLKATA
-Versus-
M/S. KARRY OVERSEAS
BEFORE :
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI And THE HON’BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJDate : 28[th] November, 2023
The Court : None appears for the parties to press the
appeal. Paper book has not yet been filed.
Perusal of the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) relating to the assessment year 2003-04 filed by the assessee shows that the income tax demanded was Rs.12,36,998/-. The appeal was allowed by the CIT(A). The revenue filed the appeal before the tribunal which was dismissed. The revenue has filed the present appeal. Thus, the tax effect of the disputed amount involved in the present appeal before us is Rs.12,36,998/- which is much below the monetary limit fixed under the Circular No.17/2019 dated 8[th]August, 2019 for filing of the appeal before the income tax department.
In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is dismissed being below the monetary limit fixed under the aforesaid Circular.
(SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, J.)
(RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ, J.)
S.Das/
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.