Case Law › High Court › Ita/666/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/666/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Kancor Flavors & Extracts Ltd

High Court 28 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · highcourtofkerala

Parties

Date of order

28 Jul 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/666/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Kancor Flavors & Extracts Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & TUESDAY, THE 28TH JULY 2009 / 6TH SRAVANA 1931 ITA.No. 666 of 2009() THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM --------------------- ITA.656/COCH/2005 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT ----------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX COCHIN. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT ------------------------- KANCOR FLAVOURS AND EXTRACTS LTD. ANGAMALY SOUTH, ERNAKULAM DIST. THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C .N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &C. K. ABDUL REHIM, JJ. -------------------------------------------- I.T.A. No. 666 OF 2009 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of July, 2009 JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair,J. At the request of standing counsel for the appellant, appeal isdismissed as withdrawn leaving freedom to the appellant to claimeligible refund of court fee. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)Judge. (C. K. ABDUL REHIM) Judge. kk

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.