Ita/669/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. Smt.haleema Zubair, Cochin
High Court
30 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/669/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. Smt.haleema Zubair, Cochin
Date of order
30 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/669/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cochin v. Smt.haleema Zubair, Cochin, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Nos.749 and 750 of2009, we dismiss this appeal also filed by the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM
& THURSDAY, THE 30TH JULY 2009 / 8TH SRAVANA 1931
ITA.No. 669 of 2009() --------------------- ITA.289/COCH/2003 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT
-----------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHIN
BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S):
---------------
SMT.HALEEMA ZUBAIR,
M/S.POSEDION FOOD COMPANY, P.T.USHA ROAD
COCHIN 682 011.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ON 30/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ.
....................................................................I.T. Appeal No.669 of 2009
....................................................................Dated this the 30th day of July, 2009.
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
Following judgment in connected I.T.A. Nos.749 and 750 of2009, we dismiss this appeal also filed by the Revenue. Registry willattach a copy of the judgment in the connected cases to form part ofthis judgment.
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJudge
pms
C.K.ABDUL REHIM Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue