In Ita/67/2005 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Rajendra Garwal, the High Court (2006) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Learned counsel for the appellant is directed to take steps for service on respondent during the course of the day failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed without reference to the Court under Chapter 12 Rule 4 of the High Court Rules.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Income Tax Appeal No. 67 of 2005
Hon’ble P.C. Verma J. ’Honble B.C. Kandpal, J.
Learned counsel for the appellant is directed to take steps for service on respondent during the course of the day failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed without reference to the Court under Chapter 12 Rule 4 of the High Court Rules.
Office to proceed accordingly.
(B.C.K., J.) (P.C.V., J.)
24.02.2006 Rajeev Dang
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue