Case LawHigh Court › Ita/67/2014 Of K.v.prakashan v. The Comm...

Ita/67/2014 Of K.v.prakashan v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kochi

High Court 26 Sep 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/67/2014 Of K.v.prakashan v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kochi
Date of order
26 Sep 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/67/2014 Of K.v.prakashan v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kochi, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: We recordthe submission and the appeal is dismissed as infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA MONDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2016/4TH ASWINA, 1938 ITA.No. 67 of 2014 ---------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER IN ITA 178/Coch/2013 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH, DATED 04-10-2013 APPELLANT/APPELLANT/ASSESSEE: ------------------------------- K.V.PRAKASHAN KAPPUVA VEETTIL, PAYYAVOOR, TALIPARAMBA, KANNUR-673 633. BY ADVS.SRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN (SR.) SRI.V.P.NARAYANAN SMT.BOBY M.SEKHAR SMT.DIVYA RAVINDRAN RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/REVENUE : ---------------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, KANDAMKULATHY TOWERS, M.G.ROAD, KOCHI-682 011. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26-09-2016,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ami/ THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN &ANU SIVARAMAN, JJ. --------------------------------------------------- I.T.Appeal No.67 of 2014 ---------------------------------------------------Dated this the 26[th] day of September, 2016 J U D G M E N T Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the impugnedAnnexure G order no more survives in view of the finalassessment order that was issued later on. He further saysthat the said assessment order is now pending in appealbefore the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Accordingly, hesubmits that this appeal has become infructuous. We recordthe submission and the appeal is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN JUDGE ami/26.9.16 Sd/- ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE //True copy// P.A.to Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan