Ita/675/2016 Of Shri Jayakumar Reddy v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
12 Apr 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/675/2016 Of Shri Jayakumar Reddy v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
12 Apr 2021
Assessment year(s)
2004-2005
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/675/2016 Of Shri Jayakumar Reddy v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal is disposed of with liberty to seek revival of the same in case of|occasion so arises.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 12 DAY OF APRIL J2OZ21
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND|
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL|
1T.A. NO.675 OF 2016
BETWEEN:
SHRI. JAYAKUMAR REDDYGANIGARAHALLI VILLAGE|CHIKKABANAVARA POST.BENGALURU —- 560 O90PAN:AEXPR8840J
— APPELLANT|
(BY SRI. A. SHANKAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE|FOR SRI. M. LAVA, ADVOCATE) |
AND:
THE INCOME TAX OFFICER|WARD - 6 (2), BMTC BUILDINGSO FEET ROAD, 6 BLOCK|KORAMANGALABENGALURU - 560 095.
... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE (THROUGH VC))
THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SEC. 2J60-A OF INCOME TAXACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 26.08.2016 PASSED|IN ITA NO.1453/BANG/2013 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2004-2005, PRAYING TO:
(1) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AS”STATED ABOVE AND ANSWER THE SAME IN FAVOUR OF THE|APPELLANT. |
(ii) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE FINDINGS TO.THE EXTENT AGAINST THE APPELLANT IN THE ORDER PASSED BY|THE|ITAT,BENGALURU|BENCH.‘B’,BENGALURUTN|TTANO.1453/BANG/2013 DATED 26.08.2016 FOR THE ASSESSMENT|YEAR 2004-05 (ANNEXURE-A).
THIS I.T.A. COMING ON FOR’ HEARING, THIS’ DAY, |ALOK ARADHE J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Mr. A Shankar, learned Senior Counsel for Sri. M. Lava,jearned counsel! for the assessee.,
Mr. K.V. Aravind, learned counsel for the revenue|through video conferencing.
Learned counsel for the assessee has filed qa memoseeking leave of the Court to withdraw the appeal.
For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal is
disposed of with liberty to seek revival of the same in case of|occasion so arises.
Sd/-.JUDGE
Sda/-
JUDGE.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue