Case LawHigh Court › Ita/678/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income T...

Ita/678/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kottayam v. Shri.sabu Varghese, M/S.mangalam

High Court 28 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/678/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kottayam v. Shri.sabu Varghese, M/S.mangalam
Date of order
28 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/678/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kottayam v. Shri.sabu Varghese, M/S.mangalam, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM TUESDAY, THE 28TH JULY 2009 / 6TH SRAVANA 1931 ITA.No. 678 of 2009() --------------------- ITA.262/COCH/2002 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT ----------------------------- COMMISSIONR OF INCOME TAX,KOTTAYAM. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT ------------------------- SHRI.SABU VARGHESE,M/S.MANGALAM PUBLICATI0NS,KOTTAYAM. THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of July, 2009 JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair,J. The question raised pertains to assessment of unexplainedinvestment based on the value of construction of a house adopted bythe Income tax Officer at the rate applicable under the CPWD norms.Considering the local conditions Tribunal adopted the valuation underthe PWD norms and granted deduction of 50%. In any case we do notfind any question of law arising in this case to interfere with thevaluation refixed by the Tribunal. Consequently the appeal isdismissed. (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)Judge. (C. K. ABDUL REHIM) Judge. kk
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan