Ita/68/2012 Of M/S Shriram Chits (Karnataka) Pvt Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
25 Jun 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/68/2012 Of M/S Shriram Chits (Karnataka) Pvt Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
25 Jun 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/68/2012 Of M/S Shriram Chits (Karnataka) Pvt Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25 DAY OF JUNE, 2020
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA|
ILT.A. NO.68 OF 2O12
BETWEEN:
M/S SHIRAM CHITS(KARNATAKA) PVT. LTD.,NO.259/31, FIRST FLOOR,10 CROSS, WILSON GARDEN, ~BANGALORE,REPRESENTED BY ITSEXECUTIVE DIRECTOR,SRI RONALD D'SOUZA,AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. APPELLANT|
(BY SRI BALARAM R RAO, ADVOCATE FOR|SRI RAMABADRAN, ADVCOATE)
AND:
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSSIONEROF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE-12(3),
BANGALORE. ... RESPONDENT|
(BY SRI E.I.SANMATHI, ADVOCATE)
THIS ITA FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T.ACT,1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED = 31/10/201PASSED|IN|LIANO.1386(BANG)/2010,FOR.THE|ASSESSMENT|YEAR2005-06,PRAYINGTHATTHISHON BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO: I. FORMULATE THE|SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN, II.|ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGED ORDER.OF THE ITAT PASSED IN ITA NO.1386/BANG/2010, IN THE|INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS ITA COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY,|ALOK ARADHE J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Sri Balaram R Rao, learned counsel for the assessee.
Sri E I Sanmathi, learned counsel for the revenue.
Learned counsel for the assessee seeks leave of this|
Court to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly, the same is)aismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-JUDGE|
Sd/-JUDGE|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.