Ita/691/2017 Of The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Bank Note Paper Mill India Pvt Ltd
High Court
13 Mar 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/691/2017 Of The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Bank Note Paper Mill India Pvt Ltd
Date of order
13 Mar 2018
Assessment year(s)
2011-2012
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/691/2017 Of The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Bank Note Paper Mill India Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13 DAY OF MARCH, 2018
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.S. PATIL.
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV|
1L.T.A. No.691 of 2017
BETWEEN
1.THE Pr. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIT(A),5 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING,8O FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA,BENGALURU-560095.5 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING,8O FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA,BENGALURU-560095.
2.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER|WARD-1(1)(3),2 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING,8O FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA,BENGALURU-560095.
... APPELLANTS|
(BY SRI K V ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
AND:
M/s. BANK NOTE PAPER MILL INDIA PVT. LTD.,I FLOOR, SR COMPLEX, NO.2, |
TAVARAKERE MAIN ROAD, |
SG PALY, DRC POST,BENGALURU-560029.PAN: AAECB 327245.. RESPONDENT(BY Ms. JINITA CHATTERJEE, ADVOCATE FORSRI S PARTHASARATHI, ADVOCATE)
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 2J60-A OF INCOME TAXACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 17.03.2017 PASSED IN-C.O.No.177/BANG/2015, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-2012,PRAYINGTHISHON BLECOURTTO]1)|FORMULATE.THE|
SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW ti) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SETASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE [INCOME-TAX APPELLATETRIBUNAL,BENGLAURUIN|C.O.No.177/BANG/2015.DATED17.03.2017 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE.COMMISSIONER CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOMETAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1)(3),BENGALURU. fii) TO PASS SUCHOTHER SUITABLE ORDERS AS THIS HON BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO.GRANT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE!INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.|
THIS ITA COMING ON FOR FURTHER ORDERS, THIS DAY|B.S.PATIL J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
There is delay of 20 days in filing this appeal.
Learned counsel! for the appellants files a memo stating
tnat the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn.
Memo Is placed on record.
Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of dismissal of appeal, I.A.No.2/2017 does not
survive for consideration.
Sd/-JUDGE
Sd/-—JUDGE
MV
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.