Ita/694/2017 Of Pr. Comissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-11 v. Surren Chanana
High Court
30 Aug 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Ita/694/2017 Of Pr. Comissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-11 v. Surren Chanana
Date of order
30 Aug 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/694/2017 Of Pr. Comissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-11 v. Surren Chanana, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: Recording the aforesaid statement, the appeal is disposed of, without deciding the substantial questions of law, which are left open.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~1
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 694/2017 PR. COMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-11..... Appellant Through: Mr. Raghvendra Singh, Advocate
versus
SURREN CHANANA
..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Rohit Madan, Mr. Nitin Gulati & Mr. Amol Sinha, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
O R D E R
% 30.08.2018
Learned counsel for the appellant/Revenue states that the tax effect in the present appeal being below Rs.50,00,000/-, in terms of circular No.3/2018 dated 11.7.2018, the appeal may be disposed of, without deciding the substantial questions of law framed, which may be left open.
Recording the aforesaid statement, the appeal is disposed of, without deciding the substantial questions of law, which are left open. However, liberty is given to the appellant to file an application for revival of the appeal, in case it is found that the present case is covered by one of the exceptions.
SANJIV KHANNA, J
AUGUST 30, 2018/tp
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue