Ita/695/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kottayam v. Angadi Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd
High Court
28 Jul 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/695/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kottayam v. Angadi Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd
Date of order
28 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Ita/695/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kottayam v. Angadi Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 383 of 2009, we dismiss the appeal filed by the revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
& TUESDAY, THE 28TH JULY 2009 / 6TH SRAVANA 1931
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM
ITA.No. 695 of 2009()
---------------------
ITA.1166/COCH/2004 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT/APPELLANT
---------------------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,
KOTTAYAM.
BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES)
SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT
-------------------------
ANGADI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.
NO.2770, ANGADI P.O., RANNI, PATHANAMTHITTA.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 28/07/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
C .N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &C. K. ABDUL REHIM, JJ.
--------------------------------------------
I.T.A. No. 695 OF 2009
--------------------------------------------
Dated this the 28th day of July, 2009
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair,J.
Following the judgment in I.T.A.No. 383 of 2009, we dismiss the
appeal filed by the revenue. Registry will attach a copy of judgmentabove referred to form part of this judgement.
(C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)Judge.
(C. K. ABDUL REHIM)
Judge.
kk
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue