Case LawHigh Court › Ita/696/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/696/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Mahaveer Shoppping Complex

High Court 02 Aug 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/696/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Mahaveer Shoppping Complex
Date of order
02 Aug 2014
Assessment year(s)
1998-99
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/696/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Mahaveer Shoppping Complex, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Hence, this appeal is dismissed. | RV Sd/-.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALOREDATED THIS THE 2[nd]DAY OF AUGUST 2014 PRESENT THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICK N. KUMAR AND THERE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.MANOHAR INCOME TAX APPBKAL NO.696 OF 200 BETWEEN ° 1. THRE COMMISSIONBR OF INCOME TAX C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD| BANGALORE "2. THERE INCOME TAX OFFIC WARD —- 10(2), C.R.BUILDINGQUEENS ROAD, BANGALOREQUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE _. APPELLANTS (BY SRI.K.V.ARAVIND, ADV.) AND: M/s. MAHAVEER SHOPPING COMPLEX|NO.13, BVK IYENGAR ROADBANGALORE... RESPONDENT| (BY SRIL.A.SHANKAR AND SRI.M.LAVA, ADVS.) This appeal is filed under Section 260A of I.T.Act,|1961 arising out of order dated 31.01.2008 passed in ITANo.244/BNG/2007 for the assessment year 1998-99praying to formulate the substantial questions of lawstated therein, allow the appeal and set aside the orderpassed by the ITAT, Bangalore in ITA No.244/BNG/2007 dated 31.11.2008 confirm the orders of the AppellateCommissionerandIncomeTax|Officer,Ward-5(2),Bangalore. This appeal coming on for Hearing this day,N.KUMAR J., delivered the following: JUDGMENT This appeal is preferred by the revenue challenging|the order passed by the Tribunal. ”.. The net tax etfect is less than Rs.4 Lakhs. In view oT|theInstructionNo.2 /2005,theappeal1SNOTmaintainable. Hence, this appeal is dismissed. | RV Sd/-. JUDGE Sd/-. JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan