Ita/696/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Mahaveer Shoppping Complex
High Court
02 Aug 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/696/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Mahaveer Shoppping Complex
Date of order
02 Aug 2014
Assessment year(s)
1998-99
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/696/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Mahaveer Shoppping Complex, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence, this appeal is dismissed. | RV Sd/-.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALOREDATED THIS THE 2[nd]DAY OF AUGUST 2014
PRESENT
THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICK N. KUMAR
AND
THERE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.MANOHAR
INCOME TAX APPBKAL NO.696 OF 200
BETWEEN °
1. THRE COMMISSIONBR OF INCOME TAX
C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD|
BANGALORE
"2. THERE INCOME TAX OFFIC
WARD —- 10(2), C.R.BUILDINGQUEENS ROAD, BANGALOREQUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE
_. APPELLANTS
(BY SRI.K.V.ARAVIND, ADV.)
AND:
M/s. MAHAVEER SHOPPING COMPLEX|NO.13, BVK IYENGAR ROADBANGALORE... RESPONDENT|
(BY SRIL.A.SHANKAR AND SRI.M.LAVA, ADVS.)
This appeal is filed under Section 260A of I.T.Act,|1961 arising out of order dated 31.01.2008 passed in ITANo.244/BNG/2007 for the assessment year 1998-99praying to formulate the substantial questions of lawstated therein, allow the appeal and set aside the orderpassed by the ITAT, Bangalore in ITA No.244/BNG/2007
dated 31.11.2008 confirm the orders of the AppellateCommissionerandIncomeTax|Officer,Ward-5(2),Bangalore.
This appeal coming on for Hearing this day,N.KUMAR J., delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
This appeal is preferred by the revenue challenging|the order passed by the Tribunal.
”.. The net tax etfect is less than Rs.4 Lakhs. In view
oT|theInstructionNo.2 /2005,theappeal1SNOTmaintainable.
Hence, this appeal is dismissed. |
RV
Sd/-.
JUDGE
Sd/-.
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.