Case LawHigh Court › Ita/699/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/699/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. A.s.babu

High Court 10 Nov 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/699/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. A.s.babu
Date of order
10 Nov 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/699/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. A.s.babu, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Since the Tribunal's finding that tax amount involved is below the threshold limit prescribed under theCBDT circular for filing appeal by the Department, wedo not find any justification to entertain the appeal.Therefore, we dismiss the appeal as not maintainable.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN TUESDAY, THE 10TH NOVEMBER 2009 / 19TH KARTHIKA 1931 ITA.No. 699 of 2009() --------------------- ITA.294/COCH/2002 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL, COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT/RESPONDENT ---------------------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,TRICHUR. BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT(S): APPELLANT ------------------------ SHRI.A.S.BABU,AYROOKARAN HOUSE, PALISSERY,EZHATTUMUGHAM P.O., MUKKANNUR VIA,ANGAMALI, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. ADV. SRI.P.BALAKRISHNAN (E) FOR R1 THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/11/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &V.K.MOHANAN, JJ. ---------------------------------------- ITA. No.699 OF 2009 ---------------------------------------- Dated, the 10th day of November, 2009 JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. Since the Tribunal's finding that tax amount involved is below the threshold limit prescribed under theCBDT circular for filing appeal by the Department, wedo not find any justification to entertain the appeal.Therefore, we dismiss the appeal as not maintainable. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR JUDGE V.K.MOHANAN, JUDGE kvm/- V.K.MOHANAN, J. O.P.No. JUDGMENT Dated:..
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan