Ita/71/2016 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Handsel Goa Pvt.ltd
High Court
28 Jun 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/71/2016 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Handsel Goa Pvt.ltd
Date of order
28 Jun 2016
Assessment year(s)
2010-2011, 2010-11
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/71/2016 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Handsel Goa Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Decision: Hence, the appeal is disposed of as notmaintainable, but with the observation that if the.appeal is preferred before the appropriate Court withina period of four weeks, the rights and contentions ofboth the sides shall remain open.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28 DAY OF JUNE 2016
PRESENT
THR HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL
AND
THR HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.SRBBNIVASKH GOWDA
ITA NO.71/2016
BETWEEN:
1.PR. COMMISSIONBR OF INCOME TAX|C.R.BUILDINGS,C.R.BUILDINGS,
QUEENS ROAD,
BANGALORE -560001.
2.ASSISTANT COMMISSIONBR OF INCOMECRNTRAL CIRCLE-GOA.CRNTRAL CIRCLE-GOA.
.. APPELLANTS
(BY SRI.E.I.SANMATHI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
M/S. HANDSEL GOA PVT.LTDQUEST INFORMATICS PVT LTD.,AS-2, ASTRAL GARDEN,NEAR EDEN WOODS,BEHIND TALEGAO CHURCH,TALEGAO, |
GOAPAN: AABCH3 127
RBSPONDENT
(NOTICE NOT ORDERED IN R/O RESPONDENT)
THIS JTA IS FILED UNDER SEC.260-A OFINCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER)DATED:17/08/2015)PASSEDIN|ITA|NO.249/PNJ/2015, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR2010-2011 PRAYING TO DBCIDE THR FORBGOING|QUESTION OF LAW AND / OR SUCH OTHERQUESTIONS OF LAW AS MAY BE FORMULATED BY)THR HON'BLE COURT AS DBBMBD FIT AND SHKTASIDE THE APPELLATE ORDER DATED:17/08/2015—PASSED BY THE ITAT, PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI IN)APPEAL PROCEEDINGS NO. ITA NO. 249/PNJ/2015_FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-11, AS SOUGHT FOR IN|THIS APPKBAL AND TO GRANT SUCH OTHEBR RELIEAS DEEMED FIT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
THIS ITA COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,JAYANT PATEL J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMBNT
The office has raised the objection that thedecision is of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Panaji,
Goa and therefore, outside the territorial jurisdiction ofthis Court.
2. Mr.E.I.Sanmathi, learned Counsel for theappellants is unable to satisfy the Court that this Benchwill have the territorial jurisdiction.
3. Hence, the appeal is disposed of as notmaintainable, but with the observation that if the.appeal is preferred before the appropriate Court withina period of four weeks, the rights and contentions ofboth the sides shall remain open.
JT/-
Sd/-.JUDGE|
Sd/-.JUDGE|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.