Case Law › High Court › Ita/71/2018 Of Principal Commissioner Of...

Ita/71/2018 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Satish Katakwar

High Court 03 Dec 2018 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · mphc_db_jbp

Parties

Date of order

03 Dec 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Ita/71/2018 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Satish Katakwar, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawnin view of the CBDT circular dated 11.07.2018.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

The High Court Of Madhya PradeshITA-71-2018 (PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXVs SATISH KATAKWAR) [03][-][12][-][2018]Jabalpur, Dated :Jabalpur, Dated : Shri Abdul Rehman, Advocate for the appellant. Heard on I.A. No.14011/2018. This is an application for withdrawal of appeal filed on behalf of the Revenue in view of the circular of Government of India, Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue),Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (Judicial Cell)dated 11.07.2018. In view of the aforesaid, I.A. No.14011/2018 is allowedand closed. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawnin view of the CBDT circular dated 11.07.2018. However, we made it clear that we have not touched the merits of the case and have kept the question open to bedecided in appropriate case. (S.K. SETH)CHIEF JUSTICE (VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA)JUDGE @shish

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.