Ita/71/2020 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Smt. Reshma Gulab Jain
High Court
07 Jul 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/71/2020 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Smt. Reshma Gulab Jain
Date of order
07 Jul 2021
Assessment year(s)
2014-2015
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/71/2020 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Smt. Reshma Gulab Jain, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: 1057/BANG/2018 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-2015 AND ETC., THIS ITA IS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Sri Sudheendra B R., learned counsel has informed this Court that the respondent has already preferred an application under Vivad Se Vishwa...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7 DAY OF JULY, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASWAMY
BETWEEN
ITA NO.71/2020
1 . PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXINCOME TAX-5 BMTC COMPLEX KORMANGALA BANGALORE-560095
2 . THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 5 (3) (2) BENGALURU-560095.
...APPELLANTS
(By SRI : SANMATHI E I, ADVOCATE)
AND
SMT. RESHMA GULAB JAIN C/O SRI KRISHNA MADHAV RESIDENCY NO.21/3 GOVINDAPPA ROAD, BASAVANAGUDI BENGALURU-560 004 PAN AJTPJ 9834B
…RESPONDENT
(By SRI : SUDHEENDRA B R, ADVOCATE)
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SEC.260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, PRAYING TO DECIDE THE QUESTION OF LAW AS IN THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM AND / OR SUCH OTHER QUESTIONS OF LAW AS MAY BE FORMULATED BY THE HON'BLE COURT AS DEEMED FIT; SET ASIDE THE APPELLATE ORDER DATED 25/10/2019 (ANNEXURE-A) PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, A BENCH, BENGALURU, IN APPEAL PROCEEDINGS NO. ITA NO. 1057/BANG/2018 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-2015 AND ETC.,
THIS ITA IS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Sri Sudheendra B R., learned counsel has informed this Court that the respondent has already preferred an application under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and therefore, the present appeal stands disposed of with a liberty to the department to approach this Court again, if need so arises in future.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.