Case Law › High Court › Ita/7/2019 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax...

Ita/7/2019 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Gil Mauritius Holdings Ltd

High Court 20 May 2022 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · ukhcucis_pg

Parties

Date of order

20 May 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Ita/7/2019 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Gil Mauritius Holdings Ltd, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Avidit Noliyal, the learned counsel for the respondent. Heard on the withdrawal application no. 5687 of 2022. Application for withdrawal is allowed. The income tax appeal is allowed to be withdrawn. **( A.K.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

|**SL.** **No**|**Date**|**Office Notes,** **reports, orders** **or proceedings** **or directions** **and Registrar’s** **order with** **Signatures**||**COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS**| |---|---|---|---|---| |||||ITA No. 7 of 2019 **Hon’ble San j ay a Ku m ar Mish r a, ACJ.** **Hon’ble Alok Ku m ar Ver m a, J.** Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, the learned counsel for the appellant. Mr. Avidit Noliyal, the learned counsel for the respondent. Heard on the withdrawal application no. 5687 of 2022. Application for withdrawal is allowed. The income tax appeal is allowed to be withdrawn. **( A.K. Ver m a, J.) ( S.K. Mish r a, ACJ.)** **2 0 .0 5 .2 0 2 2** PV|

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.