Ita/72/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Bioplus Life Sciences Pvt., Ltd
High Court
17 Sep 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/72/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Bioplus Life Sciences Pvt., Ltd
Date of order
17 Sep 2012
Assessment year(s)
2006-2007
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Ita/72/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Bioplus Life Sciences Pvt., Ltd, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.
Decision: The Revenue has filed SLP before the Supreme Court.Therefore, subject to the result of SLP filed by the revenue,this appeal is also disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE
DATED THIS THER 1 DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2012
PRESENT
THR HON BLE MR. JUSTICE K.SREEDHAR RAO
ANT
THR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICK B.MANOHAR
1T.A. No.72 OF 2012
BETWEEN:;
1.The Commissioner of Income Tax,
C.R. Building,
Queens Road,Bangalore.
2.The Deputy Commissioner of Income tax,Circle-11(2),C.R. Building,
Queens Road,Bangalore.
(By Sri K.V. Aravind, Advocate)
Appellants
AND:m
M/s. Bioplus Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd.,site No.10/1A, Krishnarajapuram Hobli,Hoodi Village,
Bangalore-560048.
(By Sri 8S. Parthasarathi, Advocate
Respondent
This I.T.A. is filed U/s.260-A of I.T. Act, 1961 arisingOUTotorderdated04.11.2011passed"$L.T.A.No.1436/Bang/2010 for the Assessment Year 2006-2007, praying that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to
(i) formulate the substantial questions of law stated thereinand (11) allow the appeal and set-aside the order of the ITAT,Bangalore in ITA No.1436/Bang/2010 dated 04.11.2011 andconfirm the order of the Appellate Commissioner confirmingthe order passed by the Deputy Commissioner of IncomeTax, Circle-11(2), Bangalore, in the interest of justice andequity.
This appeal is coming on for hearing this day,SREEDHAR RAO, J.,delivered the following:
JU DBGMENT
This Court in ITA No.70/2009 and other batch ofcases decided on 30.08.2011, has answered the questions oflaw against the Revenue. In this case also, the similarquestions of law would arise.
The Revenue has filed SLP before the Supreme Court.Therefore, subject to the result of SLP filed by the revenue,this appeal is also disposed of. The Assessing Officer canpass assessment orders in accordance with the decisionrendered by the Supreme Court with consequential effect.
od/-JUDGE
NM*
od/-JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.