Case LawHigh Court › Ita v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Inc...

Ita v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 04 Jul 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
04 Jul 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Ita v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2014) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is allowed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE: DAY OF JULY 2014 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICEK N.KUMAR ANT) THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B. MANOHAR INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.72322 OF 2O BBRITWRE SMT. NAGARATHNA|D/O. LATE SRI KRISHNA REDDYNO.993/1, 2 CROSS,1 MAIN, |NEW TIPPASANDRA,BANGALORE — 560 075._ APPBRLLANT(| (BY SRI A. SHANKAR AND SRI M. LAVA, ADVS.) AND: THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE —- 1(3),C.R. BUILDING, QUEEN’S ROAD,BANGALORE — 560 OO1._ RESPONDENT (BY SRI K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.) THIS ITA FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF LT. ACT,1961 ARISING OUI OF ORDER DATED 29-02-2008|PASSEDIN-IT(SS)A138/BANG/2004KORTHEASSESSMENT YEAR 1989-90 & 2000-2001, PRAYING THAT|THIS HON’BLE COURT MAY BEB PLEASED TO: 1.FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OFLAW STATED THEREIN,LAW STATED THEREIN, 11.ALLOW THERE APPEAL AND SEIT ASIDE THE ORDPASSED.BY|THERITAT,|PASSEDINIT(SS)A138/BANG/2004DATHD.29-02-2008,IN-THE.INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.PASSED.BY|THERITAT,|PASSEDINIT(SS)A138/BANG/2004DATHD.29-02-2008,IN-THE.INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS.DAY,N. KUMAR J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JU DBGMENT The assessee is not assessed to income tax for|any year. When the search was made in theirpremises, the undisclosed income representing the rent.from two flats, amounting to Rs./78,Q000/-, was seized.It was within the taxable hmit. This aspect has been)completely ignored and not noticed by the authoritiesand the impugned orders came to be passed. 2. When the assessee was not assessed to income tax and the so-called undisclosed income is less than.the taxable limit, the entire exercise done by the.authorities is unjustified and contrary to law. In that view of the matter, on that short ground, the.impugned orders are liable to be set aside. Hence, we.have not gone into the substantial question of lawframed in this case at the time of admission, as they do. not arise. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. The impugnedorders are set aside. Parties to bear their own costs. KNM/-| Sd/-| JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan