Ita/722/2019 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Mangalore Refinery And Petrochemicals Ltd
High Court
21 Dec 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/722/2019 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Mangalore Refinery And Petrochemicals Ltd
Date of order
21 Dec 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/722/2019 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Mangalore Refinery And Petrochemicals Ltd, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27 DAY OF DECEMBER, 2020
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND|
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASADIT.A. NO.722 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
1.|THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
INTERNATIONAL TAXATION,
4TH FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING
80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA
BENGALURU-560095.
2.|THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX.
INTERNATIONAL TAXATION,
CIRCLE-2(2), 4TH FLOOR|
BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD.
KORMANGALA, BENGALURU-560095.
_.. APPELLANTS.
(BY Mr. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.,).
AND:
M/S. MANGALORE REFINERY ANDPETROCHEMICALS LID.,KUTHETHOOR, P.O. VIA.KATIPALLA, MANGALURU-575030.
RESPONDENT
(BY Mr. VENKATESH ARABATTI, ADV.,)
THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF|I.T.ACT, 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED6.2.2019 PASSED IN IT(IT)A No.1755/BANG/2017, FORTHE.ASSESSMENT|YEAR2016-1/7,PRAYINGTOFORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAWSTATED ABOVE. ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDETHE ORDERS PASSED BY THE [INCOME-TAX APPELLATETRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN IT(IT)A No.1755/BANG/2017DATED 6.2.7019 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2016-1/7ANNEXURE-C|CONFIRMINGTHE|ORDER.OF|THEAPPELLATE COMMISSIONER AND CONFIRM THE ORDERPASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX,INTERNATIONAL|TAXATION, CIRCLE-2(2),.BENGALURU &® ETC.
THIS I.T.A. COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING,|THIS|DAY,ALOKARADHE|J.,DELIVERED|THEFOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Mr.K.V.Aravind, learned counsel for the revenue.
Mr.Venkatesn Arabatti, learned counsel for the)aSSeSSAE.,
2 |Learned counsel for the revenue has filed a
memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw theappeal.
3.)Learned counsel for the revenue submits tnat
during the pendency of this appeal, the assessee has
preferred an application under ‘Vivad se _ VishwasScheme, which has been entertained and on account ofpendency of the appeal, the application submitted bythe assessee could not be processed further. He,therefore, seeks leave of this Court to withdraw theappeal with liberty to revive the same as and whenoccasion so arise.
4Tne memo is taken on record.
5.|In view of the aforesaid submissions, theappeal is disposed of in terms of liberty as prayed.
an/-CT-HR|
Sd/-|
JUDGE
Sd/-'|JUDGE|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.