Ita/73/2024 Sunbeam Vanijya Pvt Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle 1/1
High Court
04 Jul 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Ita/73/2024 Sunbeam Vanijya Pvt Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle 1/1
Date of order
04 Jul 2025
Assessment year(s)
2019-20
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/73/2024 Sunbeam Vanijya Pvt Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle 1/1, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The said written instructions dated June 28, 2025 given along with the Form - 2 and the document are placed on record and the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn on the ground that the appellant/assessee has availed the benefit of Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
OD – 1
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction [Income Tax]
ORIGINAL SIDE
ITA/73/2024 SUNBEAM VANIJYA PVT LTD VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 1/1
BEFORE :
THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S SIVAGNANAM
And THE HON’BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS)Date : 4[th] July, 2025
Appearance :Mr. Saurabh Bagaria, Adv. Mr. Rites Goes, Adv. ..for the appellant.
The Court : This appeal filed by the assessee under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) challenging the order dated February 7, 2024 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, B - Bench, Kolkata (the Tribunal) in ITA/48/Kol/2023 for the assessment year 2019-20.
The learned Advocate appearing for the appellant has placed before us the written instructions given by his client stating that the assessee has availed the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and requests that the appeal be withdrawn. The said written instructions dated June 28, 2025 given along with the Form - 2 and the document are placed on record and the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn on the ground that the appellant/assessee has availed the benefit of Direct Tax Vivad Se
Vishwas Scheme. Consequently, the substantial questions of law suggested by the revenue are left open.
(T.S SIVAGNANAM) CHIEF JUSTICE
(CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS), J.)
S.Das/ AR
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.