Ita/735/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Little Flower Kuries & Enterprises Ltd
High Court
21 Feb 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/735/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Little Flower Kuries & Enterprises Ltd
Date of order
21 Feb 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/735/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Little Flower Kuries & Enterprises Ltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Following the abovejudgment, we dismiss the Revenue's appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN
MONDAY, THE 21ST FEBRUARY 2011 / 2ND PHALGUNA 1932
ITA.No. 735 of 2009()
---------------------
ITA.44/Coch/2002 of INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH
....................
APPELLANT/RESPONDENT:
--------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
COCHIN.
BY ADV. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES)
SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX DEPT.
RESPONDENT/APPELLANT:
---------------
LITTLE FLOWER KURIES AND ENTERPRISES
LTD., KUNNUMPURAM, KCOCHI-1.
ADV. SRI.P.BALAKRISHNAN (E)
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 21/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ.
----------------------------------------------------
I.T.A.No.735 of 2009
----------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 21st day of February, 2011
Judgment
Ramachandran Nair, J.
The issue raised in this appeal is squarely covered againstthe Revenue vide our judgment dated 22.12.2009 inI.T.A.No.379 of 2009 rendered in the case of very same assesseepertains to another assessment year. Following the abovejudgment, we dismiss the Revenue's appeal.
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE.
srd
K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.