Case LawHigh Court › Ita/735/2017 Of M/S Bairavi Properties A...

Ita/735/2017 Of M/S Bairavi Properties And v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1

High Court 05 Apr 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/735/2017 Of M/S Bairavi Properties And v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1
Date of order
05 Apr 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/735/2017 Of M/S Bairavi Properties And v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In the result, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to revive the same in case occasion arises.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5 DAY OF APRIL, 2021 PRESENT THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL I.T.A. No. 735/2017 BETWEEN : -------------- M/s. Bairavi Properties and Constructions Pvt. Ltd., A Company incorporated Under the Companies Act, 1956 Having its present address at No. 546, 10[th] Main 6[th] A Cross, HAL 3[rd] Stage Bangalore – 560 075 Rep. by its Managing Director Mr. Balajikrishnaswamy. … APPELLANT (By Sri. Rohan Kothari, Adv., ) AND : ------- 1. Commissioner of Income Tax-1 Bangalore 2[nd] Floor, BMTC Building 80 Feet Road Koramangala Bengaluru – 560 095. 2. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 1(1)(2) Bangalore Presently at 2[nd] Floor, BMTC Building 80 Feet Road Koramangala Bengaluru – 560 095. … RESPONDENTS (By Sri. K.V. Aravind, Adv.) --- This I.T.A. is filed under Section 260-A of I.T. Act 1961 with a prayer to allow the appeal and set aside the order passed by the Hon’ble ITAT, Bengaluru Bench-C in MP No. 52/Bang/2017 in ITA No. 203/Bang/2014 dated 16.06.2017 (Annexure-A) and etc. This I.T.A. coming on for Final Hearing this day, ALOK ARADHE J, delivered the following; J U D G M E N T Sri. Rohan Kothari, learned counsel for the assessee. Sri. K.V. Aravind, learned counsel for the revenue. Learned counsel for the assessee has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal on the ground that the dispute has been resolved under the Vivad-se-Vishwas scheme. 2. The aforesaid memo is taken on record. In the result, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to revive the same in case occasion arises. In view of disposal of the appeal, I.A. Nos. 1/2017 and 6/2017 does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, they are disposed of. Sd/- JUDGE. Sd/- JUDGE. LRS.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan