Ita/736/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri H J Siwani
High Court
20 Aug 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/736/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri H J Siwani
Date of order
20 Aug 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/736/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri H J Siwani, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.In the circumstances, the appeal is dismissed ashaving become iniructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA ATBANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 20 DAY OF AUGUST, 2014.
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE K L MANJUNATH
AND
THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE A V CHANDRASHEKARA
Income Tax Appeal No. 736 of 2008
BETWEEN:
1.THE COMMISSIONER |OK INCOME TAX.CRHNTRAL CIRCLEC.R. BUILDING|QUEENS ROADBANGALORE.»2.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX.CENTRAL CIRCLE — 2(3)CR BUILDINGQUEENS ROADBANGALORE.APPBRLLANTS
|By Sri K V Aravind, Adv.|_
AND:
SHRI H J SIWANL.M/S H M CONSTRUCTIONS|GBRNEBEVA HOUCUNNINGHAM ROADBANGALORE.RESPONDENT.
|By Sri S Parthasarathy, Adv.|
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF THE.INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE ORDER DATED|IO OC? .2OOPASSED|LN|TTA.NO.|456/BNG/2007,HOR THERASSEKBSSMEBNT YBAR 1997AND ETC.,
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY,|MANJUNATH, J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JU DBiGMENT
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
? During the course of argument, it is brought to our|notice by Sri K V Aravind, learned standing counsel for theappellants-revenue,that|thisappealhas|becomeinfructuous in view of the judgment rendered by acoordinate Bench oft this court in ITA No 216 of 2007 andconnected matters on 11-44-2014.
3.In the circumstances, the appeal is dismissed ashaving become iniructuous.
F@EG
Sd/-.JUDGE|
Sd/-.JUDGE|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue