Ita/74/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri C S Sunder Raju (Huf)
High Court
05 Sep 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/74/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri C S Sunder Raju (Huf)
Date of order
05 Sep 2012
Assessment year(s)
2003-04
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/74/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri C S Sunder Raju (Huf), the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE
DATBD THIS THR 5 DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2012
PRESENT
THR HON BLE MR. JUSTICE K.SREEDHAR RAO
ANT
THR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICK B.MANOHAR
1T.A. No.74 OF 2008C/W.I1.T.A. Nos.72 & 73/2008
1.T.A. No. 74 OF 2ZOOmBETWEEN:
1.The Commissioner of Income Tax,C.R. Building,
Queens Road,
Bangalore.
2.The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,Central Circle — 2(1),C.R. Building,
Queens road,Bangalore.
(By Sri M. Thirumalesh, Advocate)
Appellants
AND:
C.S. Sunder Raju (HUF),
No.294, lo[3!]Cross,Uppar Palace Orchards,vadashivanagar,Bangalore,
(By Sri A. Shankar & M. Lava, Advocates)
Respondent
This I.T.A. is filed U/s.260-A of I.T. Act, 1961 arisingOUTOT Order|dated07.09.2007passed%'I.T.A.No.1118/BNG/2006 for the Assessment Year 2003-04,praying that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to(i) formulate the substantial questions of law stated thereinand (11) allow the appeal and set-aside the order passed bythe ITAT, Bangalore in ITA No.1118/BNG/2006, dated07.09.2007,confirmingthe|order.otthe.AppellateCommissioner and confirm the order passed by the DeputyCommissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-2(1), Bangalore,in the interest of justice and equity.
1.T.A. No.72 OF 2008:m
BETWEEN:
1.The Commissioner of Income Tax,C.R. Building,Queens Road,Bangalore,C.R. Building,Queens Road,Bangalore,
oDThe Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,Central Circle — 2(1),C.R. Building,Queens road,Bangalore,Central Circle — 2(1),C.R. Building,Queens road,Bangalore,
(By Sri M. Thirumalesh, Advocate)
Appellants
AND:
A.S. Chinnaswamy Raju (HUF),No.294, 16[3!]Cross,Uppar Palace Orchards,vadashivanagar,Bangalore,
(By Sri A. Shankar & M. Lava, Advocates)
Respondent
This I.T.A. is filed U/s.260-A of I.T. Act, 1961 arisingOUT|OT|orderdated07.09.2007passed%'I.T.A.No.1116/BNG/2006 for the Assessment Year 2003-04,praying that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to(i) formulate the substantial questions of law stated thereinand (11) allow the appeal and set-aside the order passed bythe ITAT, Bangalore in ITA No.1116/BNG/2006, dated07.09.2007|contirmtheordersottheAppellateCommissioner and Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,Central Circle-2(1), Bangalore, in the interest of justice andequity.
1.T.A. No.73 OF 2Z2OQ
BBRITIWE
1.The Commissioner of Income Tax,C.R. Building,Queens Road,Bangalore.
2.The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,Central Circle — 2(1),C.R. Building,Queens road,Bangalore,
(By Sri M. Thirumalesh, Advocate)
Appellants
AND:omt. Revathi Raju,No.12, 10[3!]Main Road,RMV Extension,vadashivanagar,Bangalore.
(By Sri A. Shankar & M. Lava, Advocates)
Respondent
This I.T.A. is filed U/s.260-A of I.T. Act, 1961 arisingOUT|OT|orderdated07.09.2007passed%'I.T.A.No.1117/BNG/2006 for the Assessment Year 2003-04,praying that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to(i) formulate the substantial questions of law stated thereinand (11) allow the appeal and set-aside the order passed bythe ITAT, Bangalore in ITA No.111/7/BNG/2006, date07.09.2007|contirmtheordersottheAppellateCommissioner and Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,Central Circle-2(1), Bangalore, in the interest of justice andequity.
These appeals are coming on for final hearing this day,SREEDHAR RAO, J.,delivered the following:
JU DBGMENT
The question of law involved in these cases andquestion of law involved in ITA No.38/2007 c/w. ITANos.60/2007 and 22/7/2007, D.D. 13.08.2012 are one anthe same. In those cases, the questions of law are answeredagainsttheTEVENUE.Accordingly,theseappeals+("dismissed.
sd/-JUDGE
NM*
sd/-JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.