Case LawHigh Court › Ita/74/2016 Of The Principal Commissione...

Ita/74/2016 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Q Burst Technologies Pvt Ltd

High Court 11 Nov 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/74/2016 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Q Burst Technologies Pvt Ltd
Date of order
11 Nov 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/74/2016 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Q Burst Technologies Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal stands dismissed aswithdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN MONDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019 / 20TH KARTHIKA, 1941 ITA.No.74 OF 2016 AGAINST THE ORDER IN ITA 172/COCH/2015 DATED 17-11-2015 OFI.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH APPELLANT/APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/REVENUE: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADVS. SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, INCOME TAX DEPSRI.K.M.V.PANDALAI INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/ASSESSEE: Q BURST TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTDPATTOM P.O, TRIVANDRUM 695 502. 3RD FLOOR, LEELA TOWERS, KESAVADASAPURAM, THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON11.11.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.K. ABDUL REHIM, J. &ANU SIVARAMAN, J. ------------------------------------------------- I.T. Appeal No. 74 OF 2016------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 11[th] DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 J U D G M E N T Abdul Rehim, J.: Standing counsel for Government of India (Taxes) had filedmemo praying for withdrawal of the appeal, based on the latestlitigation policy of the Income Tax Department. 2.Accordingly, permission is granted to the appellant forwithdrawal of the appeal. The appeal stands dismissed aswithdrawn. 3.The Registry shall make refund of the court fee to theextent admissible under the relevant statutory provisions. Sd/- C.K.ABDUL REHIM JUDGE AMG Sd/- ANU SIVARAMANJUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE ATRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED BY THE ASSESSING OFFICER.ASSESSING OFFICER. ANNEXURE BTRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), TRIVANDRUM.OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), TRIVANDRUM. ANNEXURE CTRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY ITAT, COCHIN BENCHIN ITA 173/COCH/2015 DATED 17.11.2015.IN ITA 173/COCH/2015 DATED 17.11.2015.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan