In Ita/742/2016 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax -Xi v. Versus Anjan Ghosh, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The application and the appeal are accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~9
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHATHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
O R D E R22.11.2016
%
The present appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act ishighly belated by 905 days. There is hardly any explanation for the delay.The appeal was filed on 21.01.2014 but appears to have been kept objectedto. The Income Tax Department does not seem to have any clue about thefiling of the appeal or the objections raised by the Registry. It refers to there-organisation of its penal and cities the pendency of large number ofappeals marked defective. The reasons can hardly be considered sufficientcause to condone the delay.
The application and the appeal are accordingly dismissed.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
NOVEMBER 22, 2016/acm
NAJMI WAZIRI, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue