Case LawHigh Court › Ita/746/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/746/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd

High Court 20 Oct 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Ita/746/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd
Date of order
20 Oct 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/746/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. The Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Since the assessmentinvolved in these cases relate to the period prior to1.4.2001, we dismiss the department appeals upholdingthe order of the tribunal declaring the impugned ordersinvalid. ita 746/09 & conn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH OCTOBER 2010 / 28TH ASWINA 1932 ITA.No. 746 of 2009() -------------------------- ITA.123/2004 of I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH .................... APPELLANT(S)/ APPELLANT --------------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TRICHUR. BY ADVS. SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT(S)/ RESPONDENT ------------------------------------- M/S. THE CATHOLIC SYRIAN BANK LTD., ST. MARY'S COLLEGE ROAD, THRISSUR. R1 BY ADVS. SRI.K.VINOD CHANDRAN SRI.K.P.ABDUL AZEES THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/10/2010, ALONG WITH ITA.NO. 506/2009 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: SVS/ C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ. ------------------------------------------- I.T.A Nos. 746 & 506 of 2009 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 20[th] October, 2010 JUDGMENT Ramachandran Nair, J. The question raised in these appeals is on the validityof the orders issued by the Commissioner under Section263 of the Income Tax Act directing revision ofassessments for making the disallowances under Section14(A) of the Act. The assessment was directed to berevised by the Commissioner based on retrospectiveamendment introduced under Section 14(A). However, inI.T.A.No.587 of 2009, this court, vide judgment dated14.1.2010 held that no assessment could be revised forany period prior to 1.4.2001. Since the assessmentinvolved in these cases relate to the period prior to1.4.2001, we dismiss the department appeals upholdingthe order of the tribunal declaring the impugned ordersinvalid. ita 746/09 & conn. The registry will attach a copy of the judgment in I.T.A.587 of 2009 to form part of this judgment. C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,JUDGE K.SURENDRA MOHAN JUDGE lgk
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan