Case LawHigh Court › Ita/748/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/748/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Syndicate Bank

High Court 23 Jul 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/748/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Syndicate Bank
Date of order
23 Jul 2012
Assessment year(s)
1999-00
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ita/748/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Syndicate Bank, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In thatview, the question of law is answered against the revenue.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE DATEBD THIS THER DAY OF JULY, 2012) PRESENT THR HON BLE MR. JUSTICE K.SREEDHAR RAO ANT THR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICK B.MANOHAR 1.T.A. No.748 OF 2006 BBRITIWE 1.The Commissioner of Income Tax,C.R. Building,Attavara,Mangalore.C.R. Building,Attavara,Mangalore. 2.The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Asst),Special Range,C.R. Building,Queens Road,Bangalore.Special Range,C.R. Building,Queens Road,Bangalore. Appellants (By Sri E. Sanmathi Indrakumar, Advocate) AND: M/s. Syndicate Bank,Accounts Dept. Tax Cell,H.O. Manipal — 576 104. (By M/s. King & Patridge, Advocates) Respondent This ITA is filed U/s.260-A of I.T. Act, 1961 arising outof Order dated 11-11-2005 passed in Int.TA 16/Bang/2004for the Assessment Year 1999-00, praying that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to (i) formulate the substantialquestions of law stated therein and (11) allow the appeal andset aside the order passed by the ITAT Bangalore in Int.TA16/Bang/2004 dated 11-11-2005 confirming the order of theAppellate Commissioner & confirm the order passed by theJoint Commissioner of Income Tax, (Asst.) Special Range,Mangalore, in the interest of justice and equity. This appeal is coming on for hearing this day,SREEDHAR RAO, J..,delivered the following: JU DGMENT The question of law involved in this case and in I.T.A.No.95/2006 disposed of on 18.07.2012 is one and the same.The question of law in I.T.A.No.95/2006 is answered againstthe revenue. In that regard, the earlier decision of this courtin the case otThe Commissioner of Income Tax and Another -vs- M/s. Canfin Homes Limitedreported in ILR2008 KAR 3153, is relied on in I.T.A.No.95/2006. In thatview, the question of law is answered against the revenue.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. NM* od/-JUDGEod/-JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan