Case Law › High Court › Ita/750/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Ita/750/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax V v. Maharaja Jai Singh

High Court 05 Oct 2018 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

05 Oct 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ita/750/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax V v. Maharaja Jai Singh, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

$~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:20.09.2018 % Judgment Pronounced on:05.10.2018 + ITA 152/2001 + ITA 218/2002, C.M. APPL.5766/2013 + ITA 679/2004, C.M. APPL.5757/2013 + ITA 163/2005 + ITA 750/2007 + ITA 752/2007 + ITA 751/2007 &ITA 763/2007 + ITR 137/1983, ITR 78/1981 & ITR 397/1983 + ITR 297-98/1981 + ITR 9/1982 & C.M. APPL.5772/2013 + ITR 46-47/1982 + ITR 95-98/1983 & ITR 221/1984 + ITR 137-39/1983 + C.M. APPL.5770/2013 IN ITR 151/1983 (disposed off case), ITR 152-53/1983, ITR 271/1983 & ITR 438/1983, C.M. APPL.5775/2013152-53/1983, ITR 271/1983 & ITR 438/1983, C.M. APPL.5775/2013 + ITR 170-71/1985 + ITR 221-24/1985 + ITR 18/2000, C.M. APPL.5762/2013 + WTA 2/1999 + WTR 328-34/1984 & C.M. APPL.5773/2013 + ITR 283-88/1985 + 106-08/1990,C.M. APPL.5767/2013106-08/1990,C.M. APPL.5767/2013 WTR 300/1987, C.M. APPL.5759/2013; WTR 40-42/1987 & WTR + WTR 3/1992 & C.M. APPL.5765/2013 + WTR 4/1992 & C.M. APPL.5763/2013 + WTR 24/1995 & C.M. APPL.5758/2013 + WTR 28-32/1995 & C.M. APPL.5768/2013 + WTR 4/1997 & C.M. APPL.5771/2013 + C.M. APPL.5769/2013 IN ITR 297/1981 + C.M. APPL.5760/2013 IN ITR 46/1982 + ITR 95/1983 ITR 170/1985 + + ITR 283/1985 + ITR 185-88/1989 + C.M. APPL.5774/2013 IN WTR 40/1987 Through : Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr. Advocate with Sh. D.D. Singh, Ms.Seerat Deep Singh, Ms. Kavita Jha and Sh. Aditya Vohra, Advocates, for Maharaja Prithvi Raj and Maharaja Jai Singh, in ITA 152/2001. Sh. Deepak Anand and Sh. Puneet Rai, Advocates, for appellant, in ITA 152/2001, ITA 218/2002, ITA 679/2004, ITA 163/2005, ITA 750/2007, ITA 751/2007, ITA 752/2007, ITA 763/2007, ITR 78/1981, ITR 297-98/1981, ITR 9/1982, ITR 46-47/1982, ITR 95-98/1983, ITR 137-39/1983, ITR 271/1983, ITR 221/1984, ITR 397/1983, ITR 438/1983, ITR 170-71/1985, ITR 221-24/1985 & ITR 18/2000. Sh. Prateesh Kumar and Ms. Meera Mathur, Advocates, for assessee, in ITA 152/2001, ITA 218/2002, ITA 679/2004, ITA 163/2005, ITA 750/2007, ITA 751/2007, ITA 752/2007, ITA 763/2007, ITR 78/1981, ITR 297-98/1981, ITR 9/1982, ITR 46-47/1982, ITR 95-98/1983, ITR 137-39/1983, ITR 271/1983, ITR 221/1984, ITR 397/1983, ITR 438/1983, ITR 170-71/1985, ITR 221-24/1985 & ITR 18/2000, WTA 2/1999, WTR 328-34/1984, WTR 300/1987, WTR 40-42/1987, WTR 106-08/1990, WTR 3/1992 ,WTR 4/1992 ,WTR 24/1995, WTR 28-32/1995, WTR 4/1997, ITR 297/1981, ITR 46/1982, ITR 95/1983, ITR 151/1983, ITR 283/1985, ITR 185-88/1989 & WTR 40/1987. Sh. D.D. Singh and Ms. Seerat Deep Singh, Advocates, for Respondent Nos. 8, 10, 15, 21, 23 and 52, in ITA 152/2001, ITA 218/2002, ITA 679/2004, ITA 163/2005, ITA 750/2007, ITA 751/2007, ITA 752/2007, ITA 63/2007, ITR 78/1981, ITR 297-98/1981, ITR 9/1982, ITR 46-47/1982, ITR 95-98/1983, ITR 137-39/1983, ITR 151-53/1983, ITR 271/1983, ITR 397/1983, ITR 438/1983, ITR 221/1984, ITR 170-71/1985, ITR 221-24/1985, ITR 185-88/1989 & ITR 18/2000. Sh. Satyam Thareja, Advocate, for Respondent No.4, in ITR 18/2000. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J For detailed judgment, see GTR No.2/1981. OCTOBER 05, 2018 S. RAVINDRA BHAT (JUDGE) A.K.CHAWLA (JUDGE)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Respond to a penalty notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.