Ita/76/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri S Jaganathan
High Court
05 Dec 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/76/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri S Jaganathan
Date of order
05 Dec 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/76/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri S Jaganathan, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU|ON THE 5 DAY OF DECEMBER, 2018
BEFORE
THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH|
AND|
THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE K. NATARAJAN.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. /6 OF 2Z2
BEI|WEE
1THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TA®™C.R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD,BENGALURU.C.R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD,BENGALURU.
2 |THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONEROF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-1(1),BENGALURU.
_.. APPELLANTS |
(BY SRI K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
ANI
SHRI S. JAGANATHANLEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OFLATE A.S. SENGODA GOUNDER,NO.6, BRIDGE ROAD,PALLIPALAYAM, FRODE.|
.. RESPONDENT
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL [IS FILED UNDERSECTION 260A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961,|PRAYING|TO.FORMULATETHE.SUBSTANTIALQUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN AND ALLOW|THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY.THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU,|IN I.T.A. NO.68/BANG/2009 DATED 11-9-2009 AND.CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE DEPUTY.COMMISSIONER,OFINCOME.TAX,CIRCLE-1(1),BENGALURU.
THIS INCOME TAK APPEAL COMING ON FORORDERS THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH, J., DELIVERED|THE FOLLOWING:JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellants submitsthat this appeal is not maintainable in view of the|monetary limits and also in terms of Circular No.3 of|2018, dated 11-/7-2018, passed by the Director (ITJ),Central Board of Direct Taxes, New Delni. |
In view of the submission made, the appeal is
qaismissed as sucn.
SD/-
JUDGE|
SD/-JUDGE
kKVK
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.