Ita/76/2020 Of M/S Acciona Wind Energy Private Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
31 Aug 2020 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/76/2020 Of M/S Acciona Wind Energy Private Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
31 Aug 2020
Assessment year(s)
2014-15
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ita/76/2020 Of M/S Acciona Wind Energy Private Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 31 DAY OF AUGUST 2020
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND|
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD
LT.A. NO.76 OF 2020
BEI|WEEN
M/S. ACCIONA WIND ENERGY PRIVATE LIMITED# 402, TOWER-C, 4 FLOORMILLENIA TOWER, NO.1 & 2.MURPHY ROAD, ULSOOR, BANGALORE-560008(REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR.SRI. S. ARUL PRAKASAMAGED ABOUT 46 YEARS.S/O SRI. SIVAGURUNATHAPILLAI) PAN: AAFCASO4D5F.
APPELLANT
(BY SRI. NARENDRA KUMAR JAYANTILAL JAIN, ADV.)
AND"
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX.CIRCLE-1(1), INTERNATIONAL TAXATIONBMTC BUILDING, 4 FLOOR, 80FT ROAD|KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560095.
... RESPONDENT
THIS IJ§.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OI.T.ACT, 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 20-12-2019|
PASSED IN ITA NO.1783 AND 1784/BANG/2018, FOR THE.ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-15, PRAYING TO:I. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW|STATED ABOVE.
I] ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED|ORDER DATED 20-12-2019 OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE|TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU,"BoBENCH.BEARINGIN|ITANOS.1/783 AND 1784/2018 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR2014-15 (ANNEXURE-A) & ETC.
THIS I.7T.A. COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,ALOK ARADHE J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Mr.Narendra Kumar Jayantilal Jain, learned counselfor the appellant.|
2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that|the dispute has been settled between the parties under
‘Vivad se Vishwas’ Scheme. He, therefore, seeks leaveof this Court to withdraw the appeal.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
RV|
Sd/-JUDGE
Sd/-"JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.