Ita/771/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Mysuru Ammonia Private Ltd
High Court
12 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/771/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Mysuru Ammonia Private Ltd
Date of order
12 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
2002-03
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/771/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Mysuru Ammonia Private Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 1105/Beng/2006, dated 11.05.2007and confirm the orders of the Appellate Commissionerconfirming the order passed by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-12(1) Bengaluru. >; se This ITA is coming on for Orders, this day, the Courtmade the following: ORDER Four week’s time is granted to comply with the officeo...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 12 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2008PRESENT
HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK VERMA|
AND
HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE K.L.MANJUNATHITA NO ‘771 OF 2007
BETWRBN
1.|THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
CENTRAL CIRCLE,
C.R.BUILDING,QUEENS ROAD,BENGALURU..
2.|THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,
WARD - 12(1)
C.R. BUILDING,
QUEENS ROAD,
BENGALURU..
... APPELLANT(S)
(By Sri. M.V. SESHACHALA, ADVOCATE)
2.
ANI
M/S MYSURU AMMONIA PRIVATE LTD.,.
98-99,,N.R.ROAD,
BENGALURU -2.
... RESPONDENT(S)_
The advocate for the appellant has filed the aboveITA Under Sec.260-A of Income Tax Act 1961, arising out of order dated 11.05.2007 passed in ITA No.1105/Beng/2006, |for the Assessment year 2002-03, praying this Hon'ble CourtTO:
i. formulate the substantial questions of law stated above,
11. allow the appeal and set aside the order passed by the ITATBengaluru in ITA No. 1105/Beng/2006, dated 11.05.2007and confirm the orders of the Appellate Commissionerconfirming the order passed by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-12(1) Bengaluru.
>; se
This ITA is coming on for Orders, this day, the Courtmade the following:
ORDER
Four week’s time is granted to comply with the officeobjections if the office objections are not complied with withinthe stipulated period, appeal would stand dismissed withoutreference to the court.
Sd/-|JUDGE|Sd/-JUDGETy. By : H.M.NR. By: V.KC. By: D.P.S)CopyTy.Date : 22/01/15C. Date : 22/01/15.Sd/-|ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue