Ita/77/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Toyota Kirloskar Motors Pvt Ltd
High Court
03 Jan 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ita/77/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Toyota Kirloskar Motors Pvt Ltd
Date of order
03 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ita/77/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Toyota Kirloskar Motors Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ITA No.77/2017.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3 DAY OF JANUARY 2018
PRESENT|
THE HON’BLE MR.H.G.RAMESH ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
AND|
THE HON’'BLE MR, JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMARINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.77/2017
BETWEEN °
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
LTU, JSS TOWERS
BSK III STAGE
BENGALURU-560 O85
2 |THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX|
LTU, JSS TOWERS
BSK III STAGE
BENGALURU-560 O85..APPELLANTS
(BY SRI K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
AND :
M/S. TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR MOTORS PVT. LTD.,PLOT NO.1, BIDADI INDUSTRIAL AREARAMANAGARA TALUK, BIDADI
BENGALURU-562 109
. RESPONDENT|
(BY SRI S.S.NAGANANDA, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR |
SRI VIKRAM U.R., ADVOCATE)
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THESUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AND [TO SET ASIDE THEORDER DATED 19.08.2016 PASSED BY THE ITAT, BANGALORE|BENCH “B", BANGALORE IN C.QO.NO.15/B/2016 FOR’ THASSESSMENT YEAR 2ZO09-Z0LO.
-
ITA No.77/2017.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION,THIS DAY,THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICEDELIVERED THE!FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Ag.CJ (Oral):
Learned Counsel appearing for the appellants seeks.leave to withdraw the appeal. Leave granted. The appeal
is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn.
LB.
Appeal disposed of.
Sd/-ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE.
Sd/-
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.